I had the same thought. If you want to, feel free ... it's more likely to get re-used if generic stuff is factored out, and I suspect a fair amount of SOC OHCI shouldn't need anything more.
OK. Here's where I stand with this. Someone else made this work. For the time being, I'd like to leave it as it is. There are several implementations of ohci. All but one is ARM platform specific. IMHO, the work necessary would be to stub all of them and refer to a common, generic base.
That'd be fine with me too. There are also MIPS and PPC versions floating around, as well as the PCI one. It's not clear to me how much of that code can really be common/generic; but this patch makes a good start.
- Dave
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
