On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 12:20:05PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> >OK. Here's where I stand with this. Someone else made this work.
> >For the time being, I'd like to leave it as it is. There are several
> >implementations of ohci. All but one is ARM platform specific. IMHO,
> >the work necessary would be to stub all of them and refer to a common,
> >generic base.
>
> That'd be fine with me too. There are also MIPS and PPC versions
> floating around, as well as the PCI one. It's not clear to me how
> much of that code can really be common/generic; but this patch
> makes a good start.
Looking at the diff, I'd say that much of the differences have to do
with handling of the resources. I'm not a fan of the assumption that
the order of resources is important. I'd rather see something like
this
while (--cResources) {
if (resource->type == IRQ) {}
if (resource->type == MEM) {}
}
There isn't much else that is significantly different. OHCI *is*
supposed to be a kind of standard, right?
I'll mull over this for a while until something happens in my brain.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
