On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Michael Tokarev wrote: > Doh. It was US_FL_START_STOP... ;) > > Still, other comments applies. At that time (2.4.18?), there was NO > entry for this camera in unusual_devs.h. Now, in 2.4 series, there > IS such an entry, but it was added after someone else's note, not > mine, and obviously I don't know the reason why that was done...
Judging from the original submissions http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=105439522917617&w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=107273801806294&w=2 and reports from other users http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=107306490916803&w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=107636243132397&w=2 most of those entries (maybe even all?) are unnecessary. On the other hand, some of them may be needed: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=106097345805425&w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=106522986127361&w=2 Miguel and Benny, can you test and see if your E223 and F300 cameras fail to work under Linux 2.6 if the unusual_devs entries are removed? It seems quite likely that the entries for the 7 and the 7Hi aren't needed. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
