On Fri, 14 May 2004, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > Do we really need both an inline and a non-inline version of the same > > No, but we are in a stable series and it's part of an official header file.
If you want to keep the inline function that's already in usb.h, you could redefine it so that the non-in_interrupt() part calls the new function. Then after the drivers have been audited, the inline function could be removed from usb.h. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
