On Fri, 14 May 2004, Oliver Neukum wrote: > In that case I prefer a clean cut. Here it is. And yes, the ifdef is ugly, > but the helper functions in that area of the kernel are currently in flux.
Looks good to me, apart from the #ifdef-ed conversion. That can always be fixed later. So there were no calls of wait_ms() made in_interrupt()? I guess that's not surprising; busy-waiting is almost never a good idea. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
