On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 10:23:34PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Montag, 17. Mai 2004 20:37 schrieb Alan Stern: > > The basic idea is simple enough. ?When an URB has been successfully > > submitted it is owned by the USB core, not your driver. ?You may not > > modify it and probably shouldn't even read it until the completion > > handler is called. > > Hm, that makes me wonder. Does urb->status make sense at all?
No, it really doesn't. > Maybe we should simply pass the status as a third argument to the > completion handler. YES! But that's a 2.7 thing, due to the fact we would have to change _every_ urb callback :( Then you can move the status field to the hcd private portion of the urb (or somewhere else that it's obvious that USB drivers shouldn't be touching it.) thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
