On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 09:58:55AM -0400, Adam Kropelin wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 04:03:20PM +0400, Sergey Vlasov wrote:
> > On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 02:58:03PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > Ick, does hiddev really need hid.h?  If so, then we need to move it to
> > > include/linux/.
> > 
> > How about this patch (applies both to 2.4 and 2.6)?
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > +#define HID_MAX_MULTI_USAGES       1024
> >  struct hiddev_usage_ref_multi {
> >     struct hiddev_usage_ref uref;
> >     __u32 num_values;
> > -   __s32 values[HID_MAX_USAGES];
> > +   __s32 values[HID_MAX_MULTI_USAGES];
> >  };
> 
> That certainly beats redefining the ioctls, although it probably wants
> the bit below as well. 
> 
> I'll make a rollup patch if this is the direction we want to go.

It's up to Vojtech, as this is his code.  I'll let him apply this stuff,
or not.

thanks,

greg k-h


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband
Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest
6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to