Pete Zaitcev wrote:
On Thu, 20 May 2004 21:30:32 -0700
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


-       if (!port->read_urb) {
+       if ((serial->dev->descriptor.idVendor != SONY_VENDOR_ID && !port->read_urb))
+       {


Your patch says that we might not have a read_urb for the given port?
How could that be true?  The check here in open() will catch any devices
that this might not be correct for.  So that portion of this patch is
not needed, right?


I know nothing about Palms, but also that part contradicted a comment.

-       if (!port->read_urb) {
+       if ((serial->dev->descriptor.idVendor != SONY_VENDOR_ID && !port->read_urb))
+       {
                /* this is needed for some brain dead Sony devices */

So.... the patch makes the body of the if to be used when it's NOT Sony,
but the comment says that it's intended for Sony. I think it's fishy.

Oops - that does look a little fishy. I'll revisit.


-- Pete



--
Joe Nardelli
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to