On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 14:14, Alan Stern wrote: > On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Dan Scholnik wrote: > > > Up until the 2.6 kernels, there was one entry for all the QV cameras > > with both US_SC_8070 and US_PR_CB that I think seemed to work fine for > > everyone. As far as I know the only problem was all the folks emailing > > the log entry stating that the Casio entry wasn't needed. So, you could > > revert back to that, or revert back to the 2.6.3ish version (pre-as190) > > that had the overrides just for product IDs 1001-9009. I'm not really > > an expert on Casio's cameras, I'm afraid, just the one model I own which > > is 4-5 years old now. > > > > I'll be happy to prepare a patch any way you choose to go. > > How does this work for you? > > Alan Stern
Works fine for me; that's I think exactly how it was from the beginning until 2.6 and the later 2.4 kernels when all the changes were made. Just cross your fingers that it doesn't somehow break newer Casios, as it would seem every camera they ever made falls under that entry. Dan Scholnik ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
