Hi,
Is anyone [successfully] using an ISP116x or ISP1362? Which kernel are you using?
Yes, we use a ISP116x on a SuperH platform running under 2.4.22 and it works.
A snapshot can be found at:
http://www.bennee.com/~alex/software/kernel/index.php
Its based on some old code that we hacked up to run on our platform. However I have noticed several other people have got various forks of the ISP116x code. At some point it would probably be worth consolidating the work into a proper "official" driver but for me "It Works For Us" is good enough at the mo :-)
May I ask if anyone uses the isp116x and a Bloetooth Dongle? Or if anyone has at least tested this?
I would really like an "official" driver, because for me it does not work. I've got Problems with four tested different type USB Bluetooth Dongles. Some even dislike an: (I put the module debug messages after the command)
# hciconfig hci0 down
SUB URB:[fc9a] dev: 2,ep: 0-O,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:251/3,stat:0(0)
hc_simple.h: cmd(8): 20 00 00 00 00 00 03 00
hc_simple.h: data(251/3): 03 0c 00 stat:0
RET URB:[fcb1] dev: 2,ep: 0-O,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:3/3,stat:0(0)
RET URB:[fd27] dev: 2,ep: 1-I,type:INTR,flags: 0,len:6/16,stat:0(0)
hc_simple.h: data(6/16): 0e 04 01 03 0c 00 stat:0
UNLINK URB:[fd34] dev: 2,ep: 2-I,type:BULK,flags: 10,len:0/1028,stat:-115(ffffff8d)
RET URB:[fd3c] dev: 2,ep: 2-I,type:BULK,flags: 10,len:0/1028,stat:-115(ffffff8d)
hc_simple.h: data(0/1028): stat:-115
UNLINK URB:[fd49] dev: 2,ep: 3-I,type:ISOC,flags: 2,len:0/170,stat:-115(ffffff8d)
RET URB:[fd52] dev: 2,ep: 3-I,type:ISOC,flags: 2,len:0/170,stat:-115(ffffff8d)
hc_simple.h: data(0/170): stat:-115
UNLINK URB:[fd5f] dev: 2,ep: 3-I,type:ISOC,flags: 2,len:0/170,stat:-115(ffffff8d)
RET URB:[fd68] dev: 2,ep: 3-I,type:ISOC,flags: 2,len:0/170,stat:-115(ffffff8d)
hc_simple.h: data(0/170): stat:-115
UNLINK URB:[fd74] dev: 2,ep: 1-I,type:INTR,flags: 0,len:0/16,stat:-115(ffffff8d)
# hciconfig hci0 up Can't init device hci0. Connection timed out(110)
SUB URB:[2474] dev: 2,ep: 1-I,type:INTR,flags: 0,len:0/16,stat:0(0)
SUB URB:[247b] dev: 2,ep: 2-I,type:BULK,flags: 10,len:0/1028,stat:0(0)
SUB URB:[2481] dev: 2,ep: 3-I,type:ISOC,flags: 2,len:0/170,stat:0(0)
SUB URB:[2488] dev: 2,ep: 3-I,type:ISOC,flags: 2,len:0/170,stat:0(0)
SUB URB:[248f] dev: 2,ep: 0-O,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:0/3,stat:0(0)
hc_simple.h: cmd(8): 20 00 00 00 00 00 03 00
hc_simple.h: data(0/3): 03 10 00 stat:0
UNLINK URB:[4ba0] dev: 2,ep: 0-O,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:0/3,stat:-115(ffffff8d)
UNLINK URB:[4bb4] dev: 2,ep: 2-I,type:BULK,flags: 10,len:0/1028,stat:-115(ffffff8d)
UNLINK URB:[4bc8] dev: 2,ep: 3-I,type:ISOC,flags: 2,len:0/170,stat:-115(ffffff8d)
UNLINK URB:[4bdc] dev: 2,ep: 3-I,type:ISOC,flags: 2,len:0/170,stat:-115(ffffff8d)
UNLINK URB:[4bf0] dev: 2,ep: 1-I,type:INTR,flags: 0,len:0/16,stat:-115(ffffff8d)
And with all Dongels I get the message "broken pipe" after some packets through an succesfully established "pand" connection.
I heared that the driver has problems with isochronus transfers. And I
guess fromthe debug messages that the hciconfig tool uses isochronus
transfers. And because I get the error ("Can't init device hci0.
Connection timed out(110)") I guess that the "UNLINKS" are not normal
or at least the "RET URB" is missing.
Am I right?But then, why does one module have no problems with the "hciconfig hci0 up"
(hope I don't disturb you, was not sure if in this case I should mail directly and to the list, or list only)
I really would appreciate any comments or insights.
-- Regards, Christoph Torens
------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
