On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 13:09:41 +0200 (MEST) "Alexander Stohr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> other than that i feel a bit irritated due to the ub device node naming. > Documentation/devices.txt says /dev/ubdX (user-mode block device) > is major=98 and for user mode linux while it never mentions anything > that looks like /dev/uba or something, whatever this "a" means. Thanks for the report. It looks like a conflict indeed. I missed that UBD used numbers instead of letters (because it's not partitioned) and so /dev/ubd1 might mean second UBD or first partition of forth ub. Since UBD was there first, I'll come up with a better naming scheme for the ub. -- Pete ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
