Hi!
> > Specifying wakeup_enabled at suspend() time will mean one more
> > parameter to suspend() :-(. We already have enable_wake() function, I
> > do not think we want to change API.
>
> I worry about having too many callbacks. Adding an extra parameter to an
> existing callback doesn't seem quite so bad.
It is actually way worse.
Adding callback is compatible change, adding parameter breaks all the
drivers.
Pavel
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
