Hi!
> > > > Yes, agreed. Feel free to submit a patch ;-).
> > >
> > > I would prefer to wait until there is some consensus on how selective
> > > suspend works as well as system-wide suspend. After all, the two ought to
> > > share a lot of code...
> >
> > Umm.. See past flamewars on linux-kernel. We can spend a lot of
> > electrons talking how it should work, but without code, it is mostly
> > empty words.
>
> Yeah -- but without enough words to establish at least some shared
> concepts, patches can be just as much wasted effort! That is, if
> six problems need to be solved, a patch that solves three but
> prevents the other three from ever being solved is not helpful.
At least result of such debate should be patch to Documentation/ so we
do not repeat the debate next month...
> Is there a list focussed on PM issues, where such design goals could
> get agreed on as part of a design process that includes patches?
> A list not focussed exclusively on system suspend, and significantly
> smaller than LKML ... :)
I do not even have a list focussed on system suspend. There's one for
suspend2, but that's separate patch.
So now, I do not know about such list.
Pavel
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
