Greg's latest tree, on x86_64:
Badness in remove_proc_entry at fs/proc/generic.c:688
Call Trace:<ffffffff8019cfb6>{remove_proc_entry+391}
<ffffffff805a981f>{uhci_hcd_init+224}
<ffffffff8010c26d>{init+475} <ffffffff8010ff17>{child_rip+8}
<ffffffff8010c092>{init+0} <ffffffff8010ff0f>{child_rip+0}
WARN_ON(de->subdir);
which is a bit weird. How did driver/uhci get itself a subdirectory?
Maybe it already existed, and uhci_hcd_init() tried to delete it anwyay?
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
