On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Do you have CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB set? If it is, then the ub
> > driver will bind to most USB mass storage devices in preference to
> > usb-storage. Maybe you just need to remove the ub driver from your
> > configuration -- or load the ub driver by hand.
>
> Oh, I see:
>
> drivers/usb/usb.c:
> #if !defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB) && !defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB_MODULE)
> { USB_INTERFACE_INFO(USB_CLASS_MASS_STORAGE, US_SC_SCSI, US_PR_BULK) },
> #endif
>
> grrr... Ok, I had it configured as a module. Loading it enabled access to
> the device. Thanks! This was really a question for usb-users... Just one
> more, if you don't mind - what's the right thing to do now? Is ub going to
> completely replace usb-storage? In "help" it says "low performance"...
> If it really is slow, shouldn't it be possible to choose between the 2 at
> runtime?
ub won't completely replace usb-storage because it doesn't handle all the
transport protocols. Your other questions I will leave to Pete...
Alan Stern
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
