On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 10:28:05AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > > > Its not that they just enable it. Its that it has side effects. I enable > > it to support > > one device - it then 'devnaps' other devices that usbstorage supports _much_ > > better. Is there some way it could work in reverse. eg. let ub bind only > > if > > usbstorage does not, possibly making usbstorage a _little_ more conservative > > if ub is present? > > Unfortunately there isn't any way to define which driver should bind to a > device, if they are both capable of controlling it. Maybe there should > be. It might not be too hard to add a sysfs interface for that sort of > thing.
We are working on it... thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
