On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Phil Dibowitz wrote: > Here - I couldn't make that patch you sent apply. Not sure why. I re-did > it by hand, and I've attached it. You also didn't put a Signed-off-by > line in your patch, so I added that for you (I figure you want credit > for your patch). > > This work for you?
+/* Submitted by Miquel Vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> */ +UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x0a17, 0x021, 0x0100, 0x100, + "Pentax", + "*ist DS", + US_SC_DEVICE, US_PR_DEVICE, NULL, + US_FL_FIX_INQUIRY ), Why is this patch needed? What happens without it? Don't just say "The camera doesn't work"; I'd like to see an explanation of what goes wrong or else a usb-storage verbose debugging log. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
