On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, Oliver Neukum wrote: > I am working on netconsole. It is surprisingly hard. Is there anything > obvious to miss?
I don't know. Maybe just messages about URBs for 1-0:1.0 failing with various error codes... If you have a null-modem cable, a serial console would be easier to set up. > > > If the mouse is detected by the first sacrifical incarnation, the handover > > > is not to blame, is it? > > > > I doubt that's happening in this case. Since ehci-hcd and uhci-hcd are > > both modules, the boot kernel won't load them. > > NO. I am sorry about that misconception, but ehci is modular. > Uhci is static. Oh. It's possible that this has something to do with it, but I can't think what. After all, you say everything works if ehci-hcd isn't loaded beforehand. So the actions of the boot-kernel version of uhci-hcd don't seem to hurt anything, although those actions might be different depending on whether or not the EHCI controller was enabled. There are still two mysteries to solve: Why and when does the PORT_OWNER bit get turned off, and why doesn't the resulting UHCI get handled by khubd? I can't think of a good way to attack the first, so I'm concentrating on the second. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
