On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 01:15:21PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:43:08AM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 10:57:49AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 04:49:18PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > Please consider applying.
> > > > 
> > > > Description: Use wait_event_timeout() instead of deprecated
> > > > interruptible_sleep_on_timeout(). Signals are not checked in the 
> > > > current code,
> > > > so interruptible should not be necessary. Patch is compile-tested.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > 
> > > Applied, thanks.
> > 
> > Greg,
> > 
> > This should fix the behavior of the previous patch (probably not noticed 
> > yet).
> > The wake_up*() was not matched properly in the first patch (fixed below). 
> > Please
> > consider reverting the previous patch and applying this one instead.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Nish
> > 
> > interruptible_sleep_on_timeout() in one place. Directly use wait-queues in
> > other locations to remove remaining callers of 
> > interruptible_sleep_on_timeout().
> > Signals are not checked in the current code, so interruptible should not be
> > necessary. Thus, the wake_up*() calls were modified to match the 
> > wait_event*()
> > ones. There were some naming conflicts, which I tried to resolve 
> > appropriately.
> > The final replacement is within a #if 0 / #endif section of code, but in 
> > case
> > that code is ever used again, I would prefer it had the correct interface 
> > :) 
> > Patch is compile-tested.
> 
> This and the mdc800 patch that I sent are incremental to fix wake_up*()
> callers, as Greg requested on IRC.
> 
> Thanks,
> Nish
> 
> Description:  Directly use wait-queues to remove remaining callers of
> interruptible_sleep_on_timeout(). Signals are not checked (except in one 
> case) 
> in the current code, so interruptible should not be necessary. Modify the
> wake_up*() calls to match the wait-queue usage. There were some naming 
> conflicts,
> which I tried to resolve appropriately. The final replacement is within a #if 
> 0 /
> #endif section of code, but in case that code is ever used again, I would 
> prefer
> it had the correct interface :) Patch is compile-tested.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Applied, thanks.

greg k-h


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to