On Thursday 17 February 2005 11:00 am, Eugeny S. Mints wrote:
> The other related question is what was the reason to have do{} while
> loop into pxa2xx_udc_irq() handler instead of handling each irq
> occurrence separately?
It's about a year and a half since that would have been an easy thing
to remember. I think it just worked better that way; the pxa25x udc
wasn't particularly reliable, and its published errata were incomplete.
(And in several cases wrong: e.g. bugs reported as "fixed" in earlier
versions were clearly still appearing.)
Of course if you have better fixes, and are willing to take over
maintaining that code, feel free.
- Dvae
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
