On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:03:11AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 09:50 +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
> > I'd rather have "select".  I'm considering having it select ATM as well...
> > I think select is more logical: if someone has this modem, it's natural
> > that they simply choose to build the driver, and that dependencies are
> > automatically taken care of.
> 
> No, really -- it's entirely _unnatural_ that if they want to turn ATM
> off, they can't because some random driver they don't care about has
> _forced_ it to be on.

I agree on this one: if one has a USB DSL modem he can be expected to
have enough clue to turn USB and ATM stacks on.

FW_LOADER however falls into a different category, where "select" is
IMHO more appropriate.

Roman.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Demarc:
A global provider of Threat Management Solutions.
Download our HomeAdmin security software for free today!
http://www.demarc.com/info/Sentarus/hamr30
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to