On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 08:24:56AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> Andrea, did you check that patch I sent the other day?
> 
> This particular patch sure seems wrong, given the
> descriptor listings you provided.  (They show a clear
> intent to use the Belcarra pseudo-MDLM protocol, with
> Zaurus-compatible framing.)

It rejected heavily on the tree I tried, was it against git mainline or
usb-git? So I couldn't test it yet, I was just going to find what tree
was it supposed to be applied against.

It's true on the windows side, some folks used the so called belcarra
drivers (I've never tried them, linux just worked by only adding the
new ids). 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to