On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 14:07 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > Sometimes it's almost trivial to write a driver ... so in a feat of > apalling lack-of-originality they go into "simple.c". >
I am wondering if naming the module 'simple' is wise regarding the 'global namespace'-ness of it. If I'm looking at an lsmod dump and I see simple, that really means nothing to me. Maybe usbnet-simple or usbnet-simp or something like that? -- David Hollis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
