The reasons why I want to do this without breaking a
confidentiality agreement is to not let the user know
that I have disabled/enabled the USB devices.
I dont want it in user space, simply because he can
kill the app with ease...in kernel space well thats a
bit more tricky.

Ok basically as I said I'm new to this USB linux world
and again I apologise for my ignorance.
These are my goals:
1) Understand the current USB linux implementation
   which sent a shiver down my spine that
   is still reverberating on first look.
2) Implement a kernel module that I hope I can submit
   as GPLed without too many people getting their
   pants on fire.
3) Learn from people.

Much appreciated,
Garyc

--- "Randy.Dunlap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 01:24:58PM -0700, gary
> clark wrote:
> > > I am new to this evolving linux USB list. Hence
> please
> > > excuse my lack of understanding of the current
> state
> > > of design.
> > >
> > > What I want to achieve is to have the ability to
> > > enable/disable a USB device based upon the
> device
> > > descriptor information. Write a kernel module to
> sit
> > > onto top of the USB controller driver.
> >
> > Do this from within the kernel?  Why?  Why not
> just make a module that
> > grabs every usb device and only lets go the ones
> you want someone to be
> > able to use "normally"?
> >
> > The biggest question is why do you want to do
> this?  What are you trying
> > to accomplish?
> >
> > > I noticed
> > > recently that greg KH submitted a change to
> allow
> > > notification to be received when a device is
> > > connected/disconnected. When reading Pete
> Zaitecs
> > > response he made derogatory remark made about
> the
> > > change. I dont care about the remark I care
> about the
> > > validity of the change and its worth. Is Pete
> the
> > > reviewer and if so I can simply discount the
> change?
> 
> Pete is a qualified reviewer.  He isn't the only
> reviewer.
> You can be a reviewer too.  It's largely a volunteer
> "organization" (and I use that word loosely).
> We will gladly take more (qualified) reviewers.
> 
> > I just rewrote the notifier code, and addressed
> his issues.  Will repost
> > in a bit.
> 
> -- 
> ~Randy
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to