On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:33:26 +0100 (CET), Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks like a bug?
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/usb-uhci.c Fri Jan 20 09:27:50 2006
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/usb-uhci.c Fri Jan 20 09:28:05 2006
> @@ -2505,7 +2505,7 @@
> ((urb_priv_t*)urb->hcpriv)->flags=0;
> }
>
> - if ((urb->status != -ECONNABORTED) && (urb->status !=
> ECONNRESET) &&
> + if ((urb->status != -ECONNABORTED) && (urb->status !=
> -ECONNRESET) &&
> (urb->status != -ENOENT)) {
This is not what the author intended, obviously. But I am not quite sure
what happens because of it. Seems like we unlink some things which are
about to return anyway... and then return -104 instead of -84. This
may be relatively harmless. At worst, the driver resubmits and gets
its -84 that way.
I vote to apply this and see what happens. We are early in 2.4.33 cycle,
so it should be safe.
-- Pete
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
