Hi all!
On Don, 25 Mai 2006, Alan Stern wrote:
> If you want to try an interesting test, go back to the
> usb_stor_invoke_transport() routine in transport.c, just above the
> Handle_Errors line. Where it says:
Ok, I did this:
> /* Did we transfer less than the minimum amount required? */
> if (srb->result == SAM_STAT_GOOD &&
> srb->request_bufflen - srb->resid < srb->underflow)
{
> srb->result = (DID_ERROR << 16) | (SUGGEST_RETRY << 24);
msleep(1000);
}
and rerun the test with usbmon, log file
http://www.logic.at/people/preining/usbmon.bus5.new.out.bz2
I found three instances of the -104, although in my log file there were
only two resets. THe first is quite at the beginning, then long
transfers without a problem, then reset.
Maybe this helps.
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining AT logic DOT at> Università di Siena
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WATH (n.)
The rage of Roy Jenkins.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
-------------------------------------------------------
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
