On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 03:56:23PM -0300, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote: > > Hi Thiago, > > Em Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:35:07 -0300 > "Thiago Galesi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > > | <nitpickery> > | > | Shouldn't this: > | > +int usb_endpoint_dir_in(struct usb_endpoint_descriptor *epd) > | > | be like > | > | int usb_endpoint_dir_in(const struct usb_endpoint_descriptor *epd) > | > | using the const keyword? > > Looks a right change to me, but I'm wondering why const usage is not > so common in the kernel...
We forget :) > Does anybody is against? No, it should be const. thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
