On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:40:58 -0400 (EDT) Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Patch 3 is much more experimental than the first two, and probably also > more controversial (I expect David will have a lot to say about it, even > if no one else does). In fact, I won't even CC: Andrew on this one; let's > just keep it in the USB tree at first. More details will appear in the > patch message. I wondered where that patch went to. Lucky I'm subscribed to linux-usb-devel ;) I'll assume it's safe to queue up #3 as well. I don't plan on doing 2.6.18-mm2 for a few days yet. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
