On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:40:58 -0400 (EDT) > Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Patch 3 is much more experimental than the first two, and probably also > > more controversial (I expect David will have a lot to say about it, even > > if no one else does). In fact, I won't even CC: Andrew on this one; let's > > just keep it in the USB tree at first. More details will appear in the > > patch message. > > I wondered where that patch went to. Lucky I'm subscribed to > linux-usb-devel ;) > > I'll assume it's safe to queue up #3 as well. I don't plan on doing > 2.6.18-mm2 for a few days yet.
Raphael's tests indicate it should be safe. However I posted an update to #3 yesterday, which should be used instead of the original: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=115929638932247&w=2 It includes some minor changes in order to build properly with CONFIG_PM not set. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
