On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 15:58 -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > I'm afraid that I have to take back some of the superlatives that > I attached to this patch previously.
Yeep. I was wondering about submitting a CV to RH or something :-) > #2 - The setting and testing of the monitoring flag was completely > ignored by the patch. Am I missing something or the 'monitored' flag is used to double check the usbmon structures consistence ?!? In an ideal (bugless) world could this flag be removed ?!? (I'm not asking to do that!!! it's just informative) > This is not ready to go to Greg yet. What about the device patch ? Should we send differential patch against it or just ignore? thanks, Paolo -- Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: Refill s.r.l. - Tutto per la tua stampante a prezzi incredibili: su cartucce, toner, inchiostri, carta speciale risparmi fino al 90%! Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=5189&d=7-3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
