On Tuesday 20 March 2007 8:29 am, Ragner N Magalhães wrote: > Em Seg, 2007-03-19 às 15:09 -0700, ext David Brownell escreveu:
> > I see a lot of *_UNDEFINED symbols, which seem dubious. If it's > > not defined, then it shouldn't be defined! Wouldn't want to see > > anyone assume that if a value doesn't match those *_UNDEFINED > > symbols, it must accordingly be defined, for example. > > > But this lot of *_UNDEFINED are defined at USB_Video_Class_1.1.pdf. It's still dubious, but at least you're not the source of it. :( > But case this is really unnecessary I can remove all these *_UNDEFINED > and to substitute for an only one (USB_DT_FIELD_UNDEFINED 0x00) ... There are cases where the spec says "field value must be XXX_UNDEFINED", and those definitions should stay ... unless those are cases where that spec should have used e.g. a symbol from the USB 2.0 spec. Maybe some others should stay too. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
