On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 13:59 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > /* The first entry is a placeholder for the insmod-specified device */
> > - { USB_DEVICE(0x049F, 0x0003) },
>
> Is it obvious why this patch is correct? Especially given the
> comment just before the line you delete, and the code
>
> if (vendor) {
> ipaq_id_table[0].idVendor = vendor;
> ipaq_id_table[0].idProduct = product;
> }
>
> in ipaq_init()?
My mistake, quick on the patching going through this dupe list.
Might I add that this is terrible use of the device table, though.
Clutters userspace, and adds processing to module-init-tools programs.
--
Ubuntu : http://www.ubuntu.com/
Linux1394: http://wiki.linux1394.org/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
