On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 05:36:48PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 13:59 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > > /* The first entry is a placeholder for the insmod-specified device */
> > > - { USB_DEVICE(0x049F, 0x0003) },
> >
> > Is it obvious why this patch is correct? Especially given the
> > comment just before the line you delete, and the code
> >
> > if (vendor) {
> > ipaq_id_table[0].idVendor = vendor;
> > ipaq_id_table[0].idProduct = product;
> > }
> >
> > in ipaq_init()?
>
> My mistake, quick on the patching going through this dupe list.
>
> Might I add that this is terrible use of the device table, though.
> Clutters userspace, and adds processing to module-init-tools programs.
It's a hold-over from the times when we didn't have the sysfs "add a new
id" interface for usb-serial drivers, which only recently was created.
So we just have to live with it, and the infinitesimal speed hit it
creates :)
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
