On Thursday 17 May 2007 20:19, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Thu, 17 May 2007 10:44:13 -0700, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So what's the model ... GPL'd Linux drivers will be modified to > > incorporate that call, so they'd work better on FreeBSD? > > I thought that we ignored this on purpose and talking about the > licensing so deeply in the thread is too late. What have we spent > all this energy for up to this point? > > It was clear from the start that the model is exactly what you > surmised. It's a fact of life that BSDs steal Linux code and slap > their own copyright and licensing on it. The story of OpenBSD and > the Broadcom wireless was just the latest example. However, we > cannot preclude them doing this, and least of all by pretending > that they'd stop if we ask nicely. > > I chose to not discuss this up to this point and take the best > from Hans' independent insight, because this way I (as a kernel > hacker) receive at least some benefit. If I turned Hans away right > off the bat, his cohorts would still do the same thing, only without > talking to us. That would be a net loss for Linux.
This sound like well known theory: Do towards others what you want them to do towards you. I'm just giving my enemies food ;-) MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL"); If the open-source world could unite on a common USB stack in the kernel, that would be a win for all. --HPS ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel