Am Dienstag, 5. Juni 2007 14:43 schrieb Marcel Holtmann:
Hello,
> > > To avoid confusion we could rename it to usb_release_t or something
> > > similar.
> >
> > One usage is a bit weak to add common code.
>
> this is why I wanna have a general solution for one-shot buffers.
I understand and concurr, but the correct way is to free the buffer
in usbcore. It might allow us in a later stage to take less interrupts
and is the cleaner way.
[..]
> > I am fine with your original patch. Perhaps you should resend it.
>
> Greg, did you see that patch? Do you have any comments on it? If the
> solution is acceptable, I can complete the patch with the missing
> helpers and "officially" submit it.
Perhaps you need to have two flags, for freeing unconditionally
and on condition of no errors having happened.
If you free unconditionally handling errors, eg. clearing a stall becomes
hard.
Regards
Oliver
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
