On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:26:10AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> I wasn't actually able to reproduce the bug myself, but I guess it is
> pretty obvious that I shouldn't have called cpufreq_unregister_notifier
> with a spinlock held.  I haven't been doing this long enough to know
> exactly which kernel this patch should be against, so let me know if
> this ins't good.  Thanks!
> 
> 
> This patch (for the 2.6.21.3 kernel plus previously sent cpufreq
> notifier patch) fixes a bug caused by calling
> cpufreq_unregister_notifier (which can sleep) while holding a spinlock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stuart Hayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Thanks, I've merged this with your previous patch.  Sorry for the
previous confusion as to where this patch was applied against (ended up
in my -stable queue...)

thanks,

greg k-h


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to