On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 16:44:24 +0200, Tilman Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > USB: misc: usbtest: clean up urb->status usage
> > USB: misc: uss720: clean up urb->status usage
>
> Should I do something similar for drivers/isdn/{bas,usb}-gigaset.c?
> What exactly is the goal?
In most cases of sweeping API changes in Linux kernel it's the respon-
sibility of whoever is doing the change to fix up the affected code.
The capability of doing that (without the overhead of coordinating with
dozens of maintainers) is exactly why we want drivers in the tree.
That said, we can help Alan and Co. if something gets overlooked.
If gigaset or ub stop break, you and I will fix them up.
The goal is to get rid of drivers referencing urb->status. It's going
to be passed as an argument.
-- Pete
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
