Am 22.07.2007 21:30 schrieb Pete Zaitcev:
> On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 16:44:24 +0200, Tilman Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Should I do something similar for drivers/isdn/{bas,usb}-gigaset.c?
>> What exactly is the goal?
>
> In most cases of sweeping API changes in Linux kernel it's the respon-
> sibility of whoever is doing the change to fix up the affected code.So I gather, although there doesn't seem to be universal consensus on that. > That said, we can help Alan and Co. if something gets overlooked. Yep. And as the Gigaset drivers are not located below drivers/usb they are in particular danger of being overlooked if it comes to sweeping changes of the USB infrastructure. That's why I asked. > The goal is to get rid of drivers referencing urb->status. It's going > to be passed as an argument. Ok, understood. I'll prepare a patch. Thanks, Tilman -- Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bonn, Germany Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits. Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
