On 2004-01-03, Ged Haywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2 Jan 2004, John Goerzen wrote: > >> I just upgraded my IBM Thinkpad T40p from 2.4.23 to 2.6.1rc1. All seems >> well, except for USB, which is excruciatingly slow after the upgrade. >> [snip] >> hub 2-0:1.0: new USB device on port 2, assigned address 10 >> usb 2-2: control timeout on ep0in >> usb 2-2: palm_os_4_probe - error -110 getting connection info > > Might it be an interrupt problem?
Let me just brainstorm out loud for a minute... I had at first discarded that possibility, because on this machine, things are all configured automatically. However, on checking /proc/interrupts, I do see this: 11: 61549 XT-PIC ehci_hcd, uhci_hcd, uhci_hcd, uhci_hcd, Intel 82801DB-ICH4, ath0 ath0 is my wireless Ethernet card that's built-in (mini-PCI, not PCMCIA). So it would appear that USB and wireless Ethernet are sharing an interrupt. So the question is: 1) can they do that? I'm assuming that the answer is no. So what I really need to know is 2) how to fix it, and why was 2.4.x OK? I have turned on CONFIG_PNPBIOS in 2.6.x; do you think that is a problem? Is there any other way to prevent this interrupt sharing? Thanks, John ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-users
