On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:57:05 -0700, Jed S. Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh, I wish I could play with a protocol analyzer. Those are rare fish > these days. I don't even know where I might borrow one. The occasions on > which I think I need a breakout box are pretty rare. In fact, the last > time I wanted one was over a year ago, and I wound up solving the problem > by other means.
Actually, I used a software one that was free. All you needed was a windows box with 2 serial ports with full control. This was many many years ago back in the windows 98 / NT4 days. It was also pretty simple, but all you normally needed was a dump of the traffic and state of hardware flow control signals anyways right. > I'm still of the opinion that if I can just discover the proper debugging > switches to put into place, that this is solvable using software > debugging, without resorting to trying multiple kernels to see what works > and what doesn't. Add in the myriad possible combinations of patches, and > this quickly becomes a unworkable. (IMHO) Yeah, but at least we know that one of the fedora changes caused the problem. So the culprit could be found via diff. If you find out whats wrong please let me know, I would be interested. Unfortunatly, I do not have the time to investigate further myself which is why I stayed with a vanilla kernel once it worked (although sound doesn't work as well without the fedora patches.) Regards, -- Bradley Remedios [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8 _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-users
