Matthew Dharm wrote:
> 
> On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 11:29:56AM -0700, Dunlap, Randy wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> > has been setup and working for some time now.
> >
> > I'm wondering if we should begin to use it (soon or not
> > at all).
> > We would use it for linux-usb development/test and continue
> > to use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for user questions/help/issues.
> 
> Personally, I think this is a great idea.  I'd really like to see these two
> subjects separated -- it makes it much easier to discuss hard-core
> technical issues when the discussion isn't constantly interrupted by people
> who are less familiar with kernel programming.  And I say that as a person
> who, a year ago, wasn't that familiar with kernel programming.

I don't suppose you learn't anything during that year by interrupting
yourself?
The thing I like about linux is that it has a very open model, even
people who don't know much yet might stumble over that one big bug you
have been searching for. I am now were you were last year and I think a
seperate list will prevent people from actually getting to know things.
 
> > This may or may not work out.  I say this for at least
> > 3 reasons:
> 
> Allow me to offer some counter-points to your concerns:
> 
> > 1.  Many of us may need to remain posted to both of these
> > mailing lists, so the only outcomes the split are (a) having
> > 2 mail-list addresses to use and (b) being able to split
> > them up if desired (or maybe merge them if desired).
> 
> This isn't a problem for me (and I suspect for most of us).  At last count,
> I had 9 separate mailboxes and over 15 e-mail addresses (when you control
> your own mailserver, creating an alias is pretty easy).  One more wouldn't
> hurt at all -- in fact, it would be a welcome sorting.  And for those who
> want it all delivered to the same inbox -- well, that's easy too.  Separate
> lists allows, but does not require, more fine-grained sorting.
> 
> > 2.  It may confuse linux-usb users and cause cross-posting,
> > which I would like to avoid.
> 
> I'd like to avoid users posting to linux-usb-devel.  My preference would be
> to make this a list which only subscribed memebers could post.  And the
> subscription base would be almost entirely (if not exclusively)
> developers/maintainers and testers with a clue (i.e. people who know that a
> bug should say more than "it doesn't work").
> 
> > 3.  linux-kernel issues have various other mailing lists, like
> > linux-usb, linux-scsi, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, acpi, etc.
> > However, lots of messages are duplicated (cross-posted) on
> > these lists, so my personal experience says that the usage of
> > the separate lists is not as as good as expected (at least not
> > as good as I expected it to be).
> 
> Cross posting does occur, but in my experience what often happens is that a
> starting post is cross-posted to 2 or 3 lists, and then the discussion
> quickly moves to just one -- this seems to happen often with linux-scsi.
> 
> Also, as I said before, if we restrict access to linux-usb-devel,
> cross-posting won't be as bad.
> 
> > Now that I've written this down, I'm leaning towards _not_
> > splitting the linux-usb mailing list (and removing the
> > linux-usb-devel list at sourceforge.net).
> >
> > Of course, I say this without having a 2.4 release yet,
> > so we haven't really got into a large amount of
> > users and user issues/problems.  When that happens, I may
> > change my mind.
> 
> This is exactly what I'm worried about.  I get, on average, 5-10 messages
> a day (direct to me) from users of usb-storage which need answers like "Use
> /dev/scd0 instead of /dev/sda".  Imagine the flood that will happen on
> linux-usb when 2.4.0 is released.  I strongly believe that the developers
> need a separate list.
> 
> Matt Dharm
> 
> --
> Matthew Dharm                              Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Senior Engineer, QCP Inc.                            Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to