Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> > The Linux answer is the same as the MS answer (and I think in both cases
> > probably for techncially sound reasons). We get cleaner maintainable code
> > by chosing to do things right. Microkernel and isolation glue API's have a
> > very bad historical record (eg Mach) for general purpose systems.
>
> Well -- usb is not performace critical (at 12MBps at least), so many
> of arguments just don't apply here. I'd like to see drivers like acm.c
> in userland...
>
> (And having udi in userland _might_ be acceptable.)
A (userland) udi layer on top of the linux userland layer should not pose any
prolems...
I see no reason why people who want to write this should not be allowed to do
this.
J.
--
________
/---------------------------------\ /--------------------\
| Johan Verrept \ / Alcatel |
| Software Development Engineer \ / De Villermontstr 38|
| xDSL Customer Premises Equipment \/ B-2550 Kontich |
| http://www.alcateldsl.com/ ALC/\TEL Belgium |
| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: +32 3 450 3506 |
\-------------------------------------------------------------/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
