I GOT IT!
Thanks for your help. Daemonize WAS in vmlinux, but
I'd forgotten something else and it's sorted now.
[Stupid mistake with-held for reasons of pride]
Thanks again,
Ben
--- "Dunlap, Randy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
That depends on how risky you are and how important
> your
> machine's contents are (or that you have current
> backups).
>
> I've used 2.3 for over one year now, without serious
> problems,
> but some people do have problems with it from time
> to time.
> If you decide to go that route, you should get
> 2.4.0-test4,
> not 2.3.99.
>
> However, I'm sure that there are people out there
> who
> are successfully using the backport patch to 2.2.16.
> I just checked my 2.2.16 "vmlinux" file and it has
> the
> 'daemonize' symbol in it. Maybe you should check
> yours
> to verify that the symbol is there: nm vmlinux |
> grep daemonize
> and then verify that you are actually running that
> kernel.
>
> ~Randy
> ___________________________________________________
> |Randy Dunlap Intel Corp., DAL Sr. SW Engr.|
> |randy.dunlap.at.intel.com 503-696-2055|
> |NOTE: Any views presented here are mine alone |
> |and may not represent the views of my employer. |
> |_________________________________________________|
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail – Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
