On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 04:17:05PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> In addition to the init ordering issue with the initial
> patch ("usbcore" didn't get initted first), several of
> the drivers should no longer be getting explicit init
> calls ... aren't "dabusb", "dsbr100", and "plusb" all
> set with init sections even in static configs? If so,
> then the "usb-core.c" file should delete some calls.
Yeah, a few of these driver do still need to be fixed. Thanks Russell for
the instructions on how to convert them.
But are these drivers still being maintained? If so, the maintainers of
them should do it, otherwise I would be glad to do the conversion.
Hmm, so if no one pipes up within a week, I'll make up the patch, any
objections?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
greg@(kroah|wirex).com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
