On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 02:06:29PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:58:03 -0800, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 07:07:48AM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:59:44 -0800, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 08:40:48PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:56:35 -0800, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> > Hi all, > >> >> > > >> >> > I have a report here of a device in the wild that is using a USB > >> > vendor > >> >> > id of 0x0000. From everything I can tell, this _could_ be a valid > >> >> > vendor id, but I'm pretty sure that it isn't :) > >> >> > >> >> Why would usb-if give someone the Vendor ID of 0 ? > >> >> This can't be valid. > >> > > >> > I know, it looks like it would be invalid, but you have a shipping > >> > device with it, and I can't see anything in the USB documentation that > >> > forbids it :( > >> > >> FYI, If you know the company name, you can at least search for it in > >> usb.org. > >> > >> Log in to members area and go to Member search. > > > > Yes, but it does not show the vendor id for the company. Or am I > > missing something on that page somewhere? > > Well, it doesn't but if the company is not listed there, it doesn't really > has a vendor id. ;-)
I agree, they could be lying, but as this is a device seen "in the wild", and one that Windows has no problems with, we need to fix our code to support it :( thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
