Am Montag, 4. Februar 2008 16:36:51 schrieb Alan Stern:
> That's because you don't bind usbfs to a device through sysfs. You
> bind it by running a program that calls the USBDEVFS_CLAIMINTERFACE
> ioctl.
True, and unavoidable given the temporal order of usbfs and sysfs. Though
looking at it now, isn't that a misdesign? IMHO we should avoid it in usbfs2.
Regards
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
