On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 07:03:30PM +0200, Guido Kiener wrote:
> +/*
> + * usbtmc_message->flags:
> + */
> +#define USBTMC_FLAG_ASYNC 0x0001
> +#define USBTMC_FLAG_APPEND 0x0002
> +#define USBTMC_FLAG_IGNORE_TRAILER 0x0004
> +
> +struct usbtmc_message {
> + void __user *message; /* pointer to header and data */
> + __u64 transfer_size; /* size of bytes to transfer */
> + __u64 transferred; /* size of received/written bytes */
> + __u32 flags; /* bit 0: 0 = synchronous; 1 = asynchronous */
> +} __attribute__ ((packed));
Very odd structure. Your userspace pointer is going to be totally out
of alignment on 32bit systems running on a 64bit kernel. Why have a
separate pointer at all? Why not just put the mesage at the end of this
structure directly with something like:
__u8 message[0];
?
Much easier and you don't have to mess with the whole compatible ioctl
thunking layer (which I think you ignored here, which means you all
didn't test it...)
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
