> Roger Quadros <[email protected]> writes:
> >> +static void cdns3_gadget_config(struct cdns3_device *priv_dev) {
> >> +  struct cdns3_usb_regs __iomem *regs = priv_dev->regs;
> >> +
> >> +  cdns3_ep0_config(priv_dev);
> >> +
> >> +  /* enable interrupts for endpoint 0 (in and out) */
> >> +  writel(EP_IEN_EP_OUT0 | EP_IEN_EP_IN0, &regs->ep_ien);
> >> +
> >> +  /* enable generic interrupt*/
> >> +  writel(USB_IEN_INIT, &regs->usb_ien);
> >> +  writel(USB_CONF_CLK2OFFDS | USB_CONF_L1DS, &regs->usb_conf);
> >> +  writel(USB_CONF_DMULT, &regs->usb_conf);
> >> +  writel(USB_CONF_DEVEN, &regs->usb_conf);
> >
> > If you are enabling interrupts in this patch you should handle them in the 
> > ISR.
> 
> Frankly, I don't understand why this is a series. It's a single driver and 
> splitting it into
> a series just makes it more difficult to review, actually.
> 
> Sure, a single patch will be large, but there's no way to have a functional 
> driver until
> all patches are applied, anyway.
> 

Yes, I agree with Felipe. Pawel, you could remove the "RFC" prefix, and send 
the whole
one as one patch. I will test it at my hardware.

Peter

Reply via email to