Hi, > > > > > If you read the confidentiality notice, you'll see that it > > > > > merely says that the contents of the email _may_ be > > > > > confidential. Also, it warns people who _aren't_ the intended > > > > > addressees -- but if the message was sent to a public email list > > > > > then obviously there are no such > > > people. > > > > > > > > > > So I don't see any problem. > > > > > > > > Then I guess you missed this unconditional part?: > > > > > > > > "be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this > > > > e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. " > > > > > > > > This means that victor is deliberately violating his company > > > > policy by continuing to send emails to a public list, which is the > > > > direct action causing disclosure, copying and distribution of the > > > > e-mail. You can of course not blame list admins or subscribers here. > > > > > > > > I still do not see how a patch with such restrictions can be > > > > useful to anyone. But I am not the one to decide that... > > > > > > This is wrong, partly because you are quoting out of context and > > > partly because of a grammatical error in the original notice. > > > Here's the text with the context > > > retained: > > > > > > If you are not the intended addressee (or authorized to receive > > > for the addressee). be aware that any disclosure, copying, > > > distribution or use of this e-mail or any attachment is > > > prohibited. > > > > > > It is clear, from the lack of capitalization of the word "be" and > > > the fact that the preceding text is only a sentence fragment, that > > > the period following the close- parenthesis was meant to be a comma. > > > Therefore this prohibition applies only to people who are not meant > > > to be reading an open mailing list -- and there are no such people. > > > > > > This means that victor did not violate any policies. > > > > > > > Thanks for the analysis. I have talked to the IT guy regarding the > > confidentiality note. Unfortunately, he cannot understand the spirit > > of open source and refuses to drop it. > > Then I for one, and probably others, will not be able to apply any patches you > send me with that attached to the bottom of it, sorry. > That's the rules I have to work from based on my legal council. > > Some Linux mailing lists will also just bounce your email, not allowing it > through, but it looks like this list will accept it. >
Ok, I will use gmail to send the patch when it is ready. victor ================================================================================================ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information and may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee). be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by returning it to the sender and delete this copy from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. KeyASIC Inc. ================================================================================================ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
