Hi, On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 01:54:54PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:02:43AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > >>>> On 03/08/2013 12:08 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 01:37:17PM -0700, Stephen Warren > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> On 03/07/2013 08:45 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >>>>>>> this will make sure that we have sensible names for > >>>>>>> all phy drivers. Current situation was already quite > >>>>>>> bad with too generic names being used. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Is phy-$name specific enough? There are other types of > >>>>>> PHY such as Ethernet, etc. What about phy-usb-$name? > >>>>> > >>>>> we will be creating a generic (kernel-wide) phy layer, so > >>>>> I guess that matters very little. Specially since we don't > >>>>> want to be differentiating PHYs by their subsystem and > >>>>> rather by the IP name (which means phy-tegra, phy-samsung, > >>>>> phy-omap, are all 'wrong', but there were no better > >>>>> names). > >>>>> > >>>>>> Venu, please comment on what conflicts, if any, this > >>>>>> will cause with the patches you'll be sending to clean up > >>>>>> the Tegra USB/PHY drivers. Thanks. > >>>>> > >>>>> BTW, let's stop with the whole dependency between PHY > >>>>> driver cleanup and arch/arm/mach-tegra/, too many patches > >>>>> have gone upstream bypassing my tree. What we should be > >>>>> doing is figuring out how to remove arch/ dependencies so > >>>>> that patches can go upstream and not cause conflicts. > >>>> > >>>> Unfortunately, there's no way to actually avoid the > >>>> dependencies themselves. The DT bindings and EHCI/PHY > >>>> controller split are wrong, and need work on both the DT and > >>>> drivers to fix. > >>> > >>> but those changes don't need to come together, right ? I mean, > >>> for the DT part you could add the bindings to driver A without > >>> removing from driver B and span the changes accross 2 merge > >>> windows. > >> > >> There is only a single driver. It's being reworked to support the > >> new binding. > > > > alright, so what's the problem of adding new binding without > > removing old one for v3.10 and remove old on v3.11 ? It gives a 3 > > month grace period for all boards to be converted, at least. > > By binding, I assume you mean the driver code that implements the > binding, so you want the driver to support both the old and new > bindings at once? I don't think that's practical in this case. > > Currently the EHCI driver parses a single EHCI DT node, and passes > some information down to the PHY driver. The PHY driver is in fact > just a set of functions and not actually any kind of driver.
that's quite wrong :-) > The patches will split the single EHCI DT node into a separate EHCI > and PHY DT nodes, convert the PHY driver to an actual (platform) > driver, move the parsing of the PHY DT node into the new PHY DT > driver, and remove the parsing of the PHY-related properties from the > EHCI driver. Supporting both sets of DT content across that transition > would be rather difficult I think. ok, now I get the full picture. > The patches will convert all in-tree boards, and I'm pretty confident > that there aren't actually any out-of-tree boards for Tegra (that use > a mainline kernel; there are plenty that don't use DT and are based on > much older kernels). Hence, I don't see any need for a grace period > here. Even if there are out-of-tree boards, the conversion of the DT > content would take about 30 seconds. I'll volunteer to even do it > (without testing!) for any out-of-tree boards if there are any. I guess we can't delete this from archives anymore :-p > One reason that I really care about moving this forward quickly, is > that you had indicated the driver cleanup was a pre-requisite to > continuing to extend the code. Right now, the Tegra USB drivers only > support Tegra20. We'd really like to get Tegra30 and now Tegra114 USB > support into mainline ASAP. Alright, now that I have the full picture it makes it a lot easier to ack patches, thanks. Sorry for somewhat wasting time, please carry on. -- balbi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
